Web Analytics

Visit our websites: Fakeologist.com | Forums | Discord | Twitter | DONATE! | Mobile Apps | Download all videos
Thanks to Bing 'til May 1

The Fraud - There was no virus

The Fraud - There was no virus

User Photo
Fakeologist Admin

3 months
577 Views
Share Download
Want to watch this again later?
Sign in to add this video to a playlist. Login
0 1
Category:
Description:
Dr. Kary Mullis
Dr. Nancy Turner Banks
Dr. Peter Duesberg
Dr. David Rasnick
Dr. Rodney Richards
Dr. Stefan Lanka
Dr. Christl Meyer
Dr. Ettiene de Harven
Dr Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos
Dr. Val Turner
Dr. Claus Koehnlein
Dr. Harvey Bialy
Dr. Henry Bauer
Dr. Heinrich Kremer
Dr. Heinz Sanger
Dr. Alfred Hassig
Dr. Andrew MANIOTIS
Dr. David Crowe
Dr. Marco Ruggiero
Dr. Alessio Pisani
Dr. Juliane Sacher
Dr. Joseph Sonnabend
Dr. T.C. Fry
Dr. Robert O. Young

___________

Neville Hodgkinson
John Lauritsen
Janine Roberts
Joan Shenton
Gary Null
Liam Scheff
Celia Farber
Robert Scott Bell
Djamel Tahi
Christine Johnson
John Lauritsen
Lluis Botinas
Jesus Garcia Blanca
Jon Rappoport
Torsten Engelbrecht

Neville Hodgkinson:

“… It never proved possible to validate the tests by culturing, purifying and analysing particles of the purported virus from patients who test positive, then demonstrating that these are not present in patients who test negative. This was despite heroic efforts to make the virus reveal itself in patients with Aids or at risk of Aids, in which their immune cells were stimulated for weeks in laboratory cultures using a variety of agents.
After the cells had been activated in this way, HIV pioneers found some 30 proteins in filtered material that gathered at a density characteristic of retroviruses. They attributed some of these to various parts of the virus. But they never demonstrated that these so-called “HIV antigens” belonged to a new retrovirus.
So, out of the 30 proteins, how did they select the ones to be defined as being from HIV? The answer is shocking, and goes to the root of what is probably the biggest scandal in medical history. They selected those that were most reactive with antibodies in blood samples from Aids patients and those at risk of Aids.
This means that “HIV” antigens are defined as such not on the basis of being shown to belong to HIV, but on the basis that they react with antibodies in Aids patients. Aids patients are then diagnosed as being infected with HIV on the basis that they have antibodies which react with those same antigens. The reasoning is circular. ”
Neville Hodgkinson

Comments:

Comment
Up Next Autoplay